Welcome to www.newsmedianews.com - the connected place

MP3 MUSIC

True ghost story

Poetry

Search Site

within using

OLD & NEW

Oldest intelligent homo sapien remains found in Ireland
Kerry farmer apologises for horrific â€˜mix-upâ€™
Elmo Maheeny has been replaced by Rumpold Slitskin
What a Load of Trashâ€”self-generating trash research report
Our world today
Of Cannabis Freedom and Dictators
BÃ¶rhd Hooligan goes ballistic
Reporters Without Borders - Freedom of Information
Crippling the Killing Machine â€”Hermit Empeysex on war
Contribute news direct to this website
Poll results say 'No-DSS' advertising 'unlawful and discriminatory'
Newsmedianews features index
The basement Years mp3 collection
A Question of Education? Perhapsâ€”but whose? - Hermit Empeysex reports
An examination of Britain's ''improved' state welfare system
Lord Knoxborough still missing
Vote on a range of current and other issues
An encounter with the UK D-Notice-archived yarn
News from the European Union
Newsmedianews forum
Editorial
Our Muppet Democracies - Hermit Empeysex
Exclusive - the Toise Collection

Selected direct news input items

So That's Why They Kept the Drone Kill Memo Secret printable version

24 Jun 2014: posted by the editor - United States

By David Swanson
Now that the U.S. government has released parts of its We-Can-Kill-People-With-Drones memo, it's hard to miss why it was kept secret until now.

Liberal professors and human rights groups and the United Nations were claiming an inability to know whether drone murders were legal or not because they hadn't seen the memo that the White House said legalized them. Some may continue to claim that the redactions in the memo make judgment impossible.

I expect most, however, will now be willing to drop the pretense that ANY memo could possibly legalize murder.

Oh, and yall can stop telling me not to use the impolite term "murder" to describe the, you know, murders -- since "murder" is precisely the term used by the no-longer secret memo.

The memo considers a section of the U.S. code dealing with the murder of a U.S. citizen by another U.S. citizen abroad, drawing on another section that defines murder as "the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.”

David Barron, the memo's author, needed a loophole to make murder-by-missile a *lawful *killing rather than an unlawful killing, so he pulls out the "public authority justification" under which the government gets to use force to enforce a law. It's a novel twist, though, for the government to get to use force to violate the law, claiming the violation is legal on the Nixonian basis that it is the government doing it.

Alternatively, Barron suggests, a government gets to use force if doing so is part of a war. This, of course, ignores the U.N. Charter and the Kellogg Briand Pact and the illegality of wars, as well as the novelty of claiming that a war exists everywhere on earth forever and ever. (None of Barron's arguments justify governmental murder on U.S. soil any less than off U.S. soil.) In essence, Barron seems to argue, the people who wrote the laws were thinking about private citizens and terrorists, not the government (which, somehow, cannot be a terrorist), and therefore it's OK for the government to violate the laws.

Then there's the problem of Congressional authorization of war, or lack thereof, which Barron gets around by pretending that the Authorization for the Use of Military Force was as broad as the White House pretends rather than worded to allow targeting only those responsible for the 911 attacks.

Then there are the facts of the matter in the case of Anwar al Awlaki, who was targeted for murder prior in time to the actions that President Obama has claimed justified that targeting.

Then there are the facts in the other cases of U.S. killings of U.S. citizens, which aren't even redacted, as they're never considered.

Then there are the vastly more numerous killings of non-U.S. citizens, which the memo does not even attempt to excuse.

In the end, the memo admits that calling something a war isn't good enough; the targeted victim has to have been an imminent threat to the United States. But who gets to decide whether he or she was that? Why, whoever does the killing of course. And what happens if nobody ever even makes an unsupported assertion to that effect? Nothing, of course.

This is not the rule of law. This is savage brute force in minimal disguise. I don't want to see any more of these memos. I want to see the video footage of the drone murders on a television. I want to see law professors and revolving-door State Department/human rights group hacks argue that dead children fall under the public authority justification.

Tags: Drones, drone memo, David Swanson

Back to headlines
comments (0)
recommend

>Local comment

Name: Remember me

E-mail: (optional)

Captcha

NEWS + LINKS + NEWS + LINKS + NEWS

Direct news input publishing
Into the 21s Century
Are we sliding headlong down an accelerating curve of social
madness and state sanctioned discrimination and prejudice?
Borhd Hooligan writes
The Weary Web Traveller
Hypocrisy, Hatred and the war on Terror
An encounter with the UK government's D-Notice
Headlines from Ireland

Other News
Downing Street news
While House news
from the Middle-East
from Limerick, Ireland
Ireland and Europe
Report from Afghanistan
An Asian Encounter
News From America
News from Ireland
The war against SPAM
f Borhd Hooligan's column
Ending the spread of violence
Giant tsunami poised to strike US east coast – science article

_____________________________
stored items
f When Flesh & Blood are forgotten by Ramadan Akin
f The world at war
f War by Television — a backward view?- by Noel Yotslot
f Terrorism– is there any answer?
money laundering scams - confirm details here

f Religion – are you into it ?
f What price the truth? by Keith Harris
f Sex, love & rock'n'roll with Arnold Layne & Knickers McFee
f The Professional Bums
f Making the world a better place, but for who?
f Climate change – too little too late?
f Friends & Educating Rita
Christmas in Bosnia

SPECIAL REPORTS
Arnold Schwarzenegger denies beach bully rumour
* EXCLUSIVE—IRELAND RE-REINTRODUCES RAT TAX *
Ireland perfects brutunschweier clogomitis antidote
Limerick man first reported victim of brutunschweier clogomitis beetle
crop circles - the secret revealed
Ireland’s grollybelium tank uncovered
The Clonakilty cloning farm
Ranns invasion - latest details
Rare Tasmanian flea reported in Ireland
Knoxborough Hall — police stiill no closer to locating stolen stately home
Gorilla terrifies Limerick security guard
SWAPPA takes to the skies Hailed as Irish blueprint for future aircraft
Evidence emerges from the ice on human evolution exclusive
300 million year old Yeti unearthed in Ireland
Maggot colony disrupts airport flight schedule
News – is it worth it? – special report

Ñ general item f feature

Article of the Day

This day in history

Today's birthday

World Headlines

Some day you'll find everything you're looking for
a funny thing happened to me on the way to ...
reader opinion page
Click to check your browser compatibility and integrity
latest Internet security alerts
Traffic details for this site
Make Newsmedianews.your home page

Europe | Other Irish Snips | Business News |Voices of America

Submit Your Site
<List your site at Newsmedianews> | <What's New?> | <Try the Boring competition>
Click to check your browser compatibility with this site

GOT NEWS ?

Founder member of ISCOM
HARRIS-KHIOS Inc.1391
Member of International Guild of Editors

Web site hosted by www.letshost.ie
Constructed using Macromedia software
Supported by all Good Folk everywhere

&
all major credit cards accepted